Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(monorepo): remove jest-when from repo #14612

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

koji
Copy link
Contributor

@koji koji commented Mar 8, 2024

Overview

vite migration branch was merged so we don't need jest-when any more. Removing jest will be done in a following pr since it will require some eslint modification.

Test Plan

the following commands work as expect

  • make check-js
  • make lint-js
  • make lint-css
  • make test-js

Changelog

Review requests

Risk assessment

low

vite migration branch was merged so we don't need jest-when any more. Removing jest will be done in
a following pr since it will require some eslint modification.
@koji koji marked this pull request as ready for review March 8, 2024 18:13
@koji koji requested review from a team as code owners March 8, 2024 18:13
@koji koji requested review from shlokamin, a team, brenthagen, b-cooper, smb2268, mjhuff, jerader and ncdiehl11 and removed request for a team, shlokamin and brenthagen March 8, 2024 18:13
Copy link
Contributor

@mjhuff mjhuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thank you!

@koji koji requested a review from a team March 8, 2024 18:48
@koji koji merged commit 1e66720 into edge Mar 8, 2024
32 of 34 checks passed
@koji koji deleted the chore_remove-jest-when branch March 8, 2024 20:12
Carlos-fernandez pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2024
* chore(monorepo): remove jest-when from repo
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants