-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 179
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(app): moveLabware command text support for waste chute #14153
fix(app): moveLabware command text support for waste chute #14153
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## chore_release-7.1.0 #14153 +/- ##
=======================================================
- Coverage 70.44% 70.42% -0.02%
=======================================================
Files 2512 1636 -876
Lines 71224 54507 -16717
Branches 8972 4024 -4948
=======================================================
- Hits 50173 38388 -11785
+ Misses 18857 15423 -3434
+ Partials 2194 696 -1498
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
import { | ||
CompletedProtocolAnalysis, | ||
MoveLabwareRunTimeCommand, | ||
RobotType, | ||
} from '@opentrons/shared-data/' | ||
GRIPPER_WASTE_CHUTE_ADDRESSABLE_AREA, | ||
} from '@opentrons/shared-data' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think these are types so probably getting back type
and moving them down would be better.
Then import GRIPPER_WASTE_CHUTE_ADDRESSABLE_AREA
separately.
} from '@opentrons/shared-data' | ||
import { i18n } from '../../../i18n' | ||
import { CommandText } from '../' | ||
import { mockRobotSideAnalysis } from '../__fixtures__' | ||
|
||
import type { | ||
AspirateInPlaceRunTimeCommand, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately, I cannot run a protocol due to robot-server's limitations, but the changes make sense to me.
The comment is a very small thing.
closes RQA-2037
Overview
Add waste chute support in run log for moving labware into the waste chute
Test Plan
Test with the protocol attached to the ticket! Look at the run log and see that the command text for moving labware into waste chute is correct
Changelog
moveLabwareCommandText
and add test coverageReview requests
see test plan
Risk assessment
low