Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: By default there is no ELRL railtype. #277

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2023

Conversation

frosch123
Copy link
Member

To define ELRL trains, you can either

  • define a railtype table containing ELRL, or
  • use track_type=RAIL with engine_class=ENGINE_CLASS_ELECTRIC.

This was already reflected in the documentation.

In no case does ELRL match MONO.

@Brickblock1
Copy link
Contributor

You should probably change that 4 to a 3 while you are at it. : )

To define ELRL trains, you can either
* define a railtype table containing ELRL, or
* use track_type=RAIL with engine_class=ENGINE_CLASS_ELECTRIC.
This was already reflected in the documentation.
@frosch123 frosch123 merged commit 5f5dbaa into OpenTTD:master Feb 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants