Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow some (or all) functionality while in AP mode #120

Closed
glynhudson opened this issue Nov 11, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

Allow some (or all) functionality while in AP mode #120

glynhudson opened this issue Nov 11, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@glynhudson
Copy link
Contributor

A while back due the web server memory issues we made the change to only display the list of nearby networks to connect to when in AP mode. It's become apparent in real-world testing that being able to fully control the unit while in AP mode would be very useful

E.g. charger is installed a remote location with no nearby WiFi network available, unit is used as a mobile EVSE therefore location is always different making connecting to a local WiFi network impossible.

After implementing PR #87 and #83 to embed SPIFFS into the flash am I correct in thinking we have some more memory headroom to play with now we are not mounting SPIFFS? If so would it be feasible to enable operation of all functions while in AP mode?

If so it would probably also be a good idea to add the ability to set the SSID and PSK to secure the AP network when installed in public locations. I have been told by EV installers that a local admin login to be able to test the functions of the charge point would be very useful.

@jeremypoulter
Copy link
Collaborator

jeremypoulter commented Nov 11, 2017 via email

@glynhudson
Copy link
Contributor Author

glynhudson commented Nov 12, 2017 via email

@jeremypoulter
Copy link
Collaborator

jeremypoulter commented Nov 12, 2017 via email

@glynhudson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Good idea 👍

I can confirm that browsing to /home.htm gives us the full interface and seems to work well (no stability issues).

I agree, it would be best not to overload a user with the full interface when all they want to do is to configure WiFi. A button is a good idea. I've added it to master branch.

Can you think of any improvements to the wording / layout:

screenshot_20171113-181246

Stef-Sijben pushed a commit to Stef-Sijben/ESP8266_WiFi_v2.x that referenced this issue Apr 12, 2019
chaseadam pushed a commit to chaseadam/ESP8266_WiFi_v2.x that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants