Display vetting types in institution overview #292
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The self-vet, and self-asserted vetting types where not yet displayed on the `/institution-configuration` page. This configuration was added to the table of other options. And the explaining texts where translated to NL and EN. See: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/183376863
MKodde
force-pushed
the
feature/show-sat-institution-configuration
branch
from
b6ed783 to
0ac3d42
Compare
Shaky212
approved these changes
Nov 2, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The self-vet, and self-asserted vetting types where not yet displayed on the
/institution-configurationpage. This configuration was added to the table of other options. And the explaining texts where translated to NL and EN.@Shaky212 no relevant test coverage could be added that I could think of. I could create a behat test in
Stepup-deployBut chances are very slim that much additional work would be beneficial.See: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/183376863