Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix:Segmentation fault in zremrangebyrank #2896

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

chejinge
Copy link
Collaborator

@chejinge chejinge commented Sep 10, 2024

#2891

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the ZRemRangeByRank command to support a broader range of input parameters for improved functionality.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved interaction between cache and database for better performance and reliability.
  • Tests

    • Added new test cases for the ZRemRangeByRank command to ensure expected behavior across various scenarios, including edge cases with duplicate scores.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the ZRemrangebyrankCmd class in the src/pika_zset.cc file, enhancing the DoInitial and DoUpdateCache methods. New member variables min_ and max_ are added to specify a range for operations, and the DoUpdateCache method is modified to include an additional parameter, db_, during cache interactions. Additionally, new test cases for the ZRemRangeByRank command are added in the tests/integration/zset_test.go file to improve testing coverage.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/pika_zset.cc Modified ZRemrangebyrankCmd::DoInitial to assign min_ and max_ from command arguments; updated DoUpdateCache to include db_ in the ZRemrangebyrank method call.
tests/integration/zset_test.go Added three new test cases for ZRemRangeByRank command to enhance testing coverage for sorted set functionality.

Possibly related issues

🐰 In the code where the zsets play,
A new parameter joins the fray!
With db_ now in the mix,
Cache updates get their fix.
Hopping through ranks, all will be fine,
In the world of Pika, we brightly shine! ✨


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b926d52 and ace3b84.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/pika_zset.cc (2 hunks)
  • tests/integration/zset_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • src/pika_zset.cc
  • tests/integration/zset_test.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ☢️ Bug Something isn't working label Sep 10, 2024
@chejinge chejinge force-pushed the = branch 2 times, most recently from f7cdb19 to b926d52 Compare September 12, 2024 02:47
@chejinge chejinge merged commit 66f71c5 into OpenAtomFoundation:unstable Sep 13, 2024
12 checks passed
chejinge added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
cheniujh pushed a commit to cheniujh/pika that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
@chejinge chejinge deleted the = branch November 4, 2024 07:57
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
☢️ Bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants