-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added support for a trait based reqwest Rust client #19788
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
891b541
Added Rust Reqwest trait based client
ranger-ross 2502676
Fixed Cargo imports for reqwest trait template
ranger-ross 0d29c47
Added support for mockall to Rust reqwest trait library
ranger-ross 7e2f2d7
Added MockApiClient when mockall and topLevelClient are enabled
ranger-ross f96453e
Added missing flags to Rust generator documentation
ranger-ross e244ec6
feat: add support for single argument and bon builder
TroyKomodo 0bcfd67
Rebuilt rust samples
ranger-ross File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ | ||
generatorName: rust | ||
outputDir: samples/client/petstore/rust/reqwest-trait/petstore | ||
library: reqwest-trait | ||
inputSpec: modules/openapi-generator/src/test/resources/3_0/rust/petstore.yaml | ||
templateDir: modules/openapi-generator/src/main/resources/rust | ||
additionalProperties: | ||
topLevelApiClient: true | ||
packageName: petstore-reqwest | ||
mockall: true | ||
enumNameMappings: | ||
delivered: shipped |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what about putting
[features]
inside themockall
mustache tags?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@wing328 I thought about that originally, but figured it would be easier to always add
[features]
so adding new features in the future would be easier.ie.
But I do not have a strong opinion on this, we can change if there is a reason to 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that's ok. i may file a PR later to update it