Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Java] [Kotlin] ignore unsupported schemes instead of throwing exception #15817

Conversation

tiffmaelite
Copy link
Contributor

@tiffmaelite tiffmaelite commented Jun 12, 2023

Partially revert changes of #14876 and replace them with a new implementation which fixes the underlying issue while avoiding changing behavior by introducing potentially unexpected exception-throwing situations. As a result, the previous behavior of silently ignoring unsupported schemes is kept.

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
  • Run the following to build the project and update samples:
    ./mvnw clean package 
    ./bin/generate-samples.sh
    ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh
    
    Commit all changed files.
    This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
    These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
    You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
    For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH.
  • File the PR against the correct branch: master (6.3.0) (minor release - breaking changes with fallbacks), 7.0.x (breaking changes without fallbacks)
  • If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

Java: @bbdouglas (2017/07) @sreeshas (2017/08) @jfiala (2017/08) @lukoyanov (2017/09) @cbornet (2017/09) @jeff9finger (2018/01) @karismann (2019/03) @Zomzog (2019/04) @lwlee2608 (2019/10)

Kotlin: @jimschubert (2017/09) ❤️, @dr4ke616 (2018/08) @karismann (2019/03) @Zomzog (2019/04) @andrewemery (2019/10) @4brunu (2019/11) @yutaka0m (2020/03) @stefankoppier (2022/06)

@@ -72,11 +72,16 @@ class ApiClient(
authNames: Array<String>
) : this(baseUrl, okHttpClientBuilder) {
authNames.forEach { authName ->
val auth = when (authName) {
"petstore_auth" -> OAuth(OAuthFlow.implicit, "http://petstore.swagger.io/api/oauth/dialog", "", "write:pets, read:pets")"api_key" -> ApiKeyAuth("header", "api_key")
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tiffmaelite tiffmaelite Jun 12, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that this was also incorrect kotlin code due to the lack of line break before "api_key"
But I wonder why compilation and/or tests did not fail when this was introduced

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

agreed. the CI should have caught the issue. let me take a look tomorrow or later this week

Copy link
Member

@wing328 wing328 Jun 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the code still compiles in the latest master so the CI is doing the "right" thing

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i cannot come up with a way off the top of my head to catch this issue easily moving forward. will merge this for the time being and later add a test (hopefully)

@tiffmaelite tiffmaelite marked this pull request as ready for review June 12, 2023 09:23
@wing328 wing328 merged commit 0e212f5 into OpenAPITools:master Jun 15, 2023
@tiffmaelite tiffmaelite deleted the fix/fix_no-exception-unsupported-scheme-java-kotlin branch June 16, 2023 06:18
fmoraespadtec pushed a commit to padteclab/openapi-generator that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2023
@wing328 wing328 added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Jul 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants