Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: evm unit test #6485

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: x
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fix: evm unit test #6485

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sidmorizon
Copy link
Contributor

@sidmorizon sidmorizon commented Jan 10, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Workflow Enhancement

    • Added manual trigger option for GitHub Actions workflow
    • Allows on-demand testing without creating pull requests or pushing changes
  • Documentation

    • Added comment block in test file for running tests with Jest

Copy link

codesandbox bot commented Jan 10, 2025

Review or Edit in CodeSandbox

Open the branch in Web EditorVS CodeInsiders

Open Preview

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 10, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a minor modification to the GitHub Actions workflow configuration and adds a comment in a test file. The workflow update enables manual triggering through the workflow_dispatch event, providing more flexibility for initiating tests. The test file change involves adding a Jest test command comment without altering any existing functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/unittest.yml Added workflow_dispatch event to allow manual workflow triggering
packages/core/src/chains/evm/message.test.ts Inserted a comment block with a Jest test command

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GitHub Actions
    participant Test Suite

    User->>GitHub Actions: Manually trigger workflow
    GitHub Actions->>Test Suite: Run unit tests
    Test Suite-->>GitHub Actions: Return test results
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 33e0760 and a56d476.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/unittest.yml (1 hunks)
  • packages/core/src/chains/evm/message.test.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/unittest.yml (1)

4-4: LGTM! Good addition of manual trigger.

Adding workflow_dispatch enables manual workflow runs. This helps with testing and debugging.

packages/core/src/chains/evm/message.test.ts (1)

5-7: LGTM! Helpful test command documentation.

The added comment helps developers run this specific test file. Clear and useful documentation.

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary or Summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sidmorizon sidmorizon marked this pull request as ready for review January 10, 2025 03:58
@sidmorizon sidmorizon enabled auto-merge (squash) January 10, 2025 03:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants