Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 18, 2024. It is now read-only.

Jakarta compatible version of ews-java-api #773

Open
paolobazzi opened this issue Dec 20, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Jakarta compatible version of ews-java-api #773

paolobazzi opened this issue Dec 20, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@paolobazzi
Copy link

The ews-java-api library depends on Java EE javax-packages in two classes:

  • microsoft.exchange.webservices.data.core.request.ServiceRequestBase
  • microsoft.exchange.webservices.data.property.complex.TimeChange

This makes it impossible to use this library on a Java EE Jakarta-based application using version >=9, see https://jakarta.ee/specifications/platform/9/.

We migrated the ews-java-api as local patch for our application.
If there is any interest to provide a Jakarta compatible version of ews-java-api I could provide a pull request with this changes.

@davidmoten
Copy link

You do realise the last commit here was 5 years ago?

@paolobazzi
Copy link
Author

Yes of course, that was the reason for this question instead of directly creating a pull request.
As we have a working patch for our application we're fine. I would only create a pull request if there is any interest by other users.

@ivanchong123
Copy link

The ews-java-api library depends on Java EE javax-packages in two classes:

  • microsoft.exchange.webservices.data.core.request.ServiceRequestBase
  • microsoft.exchange.webservices.data.property.complex.TimeChange

This makes it impossible to use this library on a Java EE Jakarta-based application using version >=9, see https://jakarta.ee/specifications/platform/9/.

We migrated the ews-java-api as local patch for our application. If there is any interest to provide a Jakarta compatible version of ews-java-api I could provide a pull request with this changes.

Hi, i am interest on the Jakarta compatible version of ews-java-api. Can you please provide the pull request of the changes?

@nateko
Copy link

nateko commented Mar 28, 2024

Yes of course, that was the reason for this question instead of directly creating a pull request. As we have a working patch for our application we're fine. I would only create a pull request if there is any interest by other users.

Please create a pull request when you can. Many people are interested.

@paolobazzi
Copy link
Author

I added a simple patch - basically just two imports need to be adjusted and the according dependencies needs to be udpated to a jakarta-compatible version.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants