Fix race condition on Nuget build #2930
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop/main374 #2930 +/- ##
===================================================
+ Coverage 54.86% 54.90% +0.04%
===================================================
Files 349 349
Lines 66377 66377
Branches 13624 13624
===================================================
+ Hits 36415 36444 +29
+ Misses 25977 25950 -27
+ Partials 3985 3983 -2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
still failing sometimes... |
|
now ready for review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
Files not reviewed (1)
- Stack/Opc.Ua.Core/Opc.Ua.Core.csproj: Language not supported
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
Files not reviewed (1)
- Stack/Opc.Ua.Core/Opc.Ua.Core.csproj: Language not supported
romanett
approved these changes
Jan 16, 2025
mregen
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2025
* Some cleanup of the new APIs and Union implementation. * fix build * Handle status code Uncertain according to the specification (#2898) * #2896: Write output arguments for good and uncertain status code When a method state's call method is invoked the output arguments should be written in case the status code is good or uncertain. This behavior would be conform with the current specification. * #2896: The service result corresponds the method call result The result of the Call method in the CustomNodeManager2 class represents the status of the CallMethodResult. It does not correspond to the ServiceResult of the CallResponse, thus returning Good as a general response is incorrect behavior. * Add SetHiResClockDisabled & fix Rejected Store Creation in ApplicationConfigurationBuilder (#2909) Add the method SetHiResClockDisabled to IApplicationConfigurationBuilder Fix the type of RejectedStore Created by the Builder to: CertificateStoreIdentifier * revert based on feedback * move some logic from class code to encoder/decoder * Fix race condition on Nuget build (#2930) - nodeset xmlzip is created in obj folders if multiple targets are built in parallel
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
Avoid race using separate zip directories.
Related Issues
Types of changes
What types of changes does your code introduce?
Put an
xin the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR.Checklist
Put an
xin the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...