Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[bitv] Add support for model generation #841
[bitv] Add support for model generation #841
Changes from 1 commit
99f867e
6409856
f1381aa
d5eddc0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that your code is correct but I'm not sure to understand why you don't use again
is_cte_abstract (embed x)
to check ifx
is a constant of the BV theory?Besides,
r
should be an element of its equivalent class, thus we don't need to check it twice.I guess the above snippet does the same check:
We can check if the values appear first in the list
eq
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Honestly, because I copied this code from
arith.ml
😅I think we can indeed use
is_cte_abstract biv (X.extract x)
instead.r
is not actually guaranteed to be an element of its equivalence class, because the equivalence class only contains term representatives (i.e. values returned byX.make
for some term) whiler
may be dynamically created, so we need to checkr
separately.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point for the equivalence class. We should add a comment about this pitfall at some point in the union-find. I don't think putting a comment to explain this here is appropriate as the issue occurs in all theories.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.