-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 658
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] stock_account_product_run_fifo_hook: raise error when validate the delivery order #1761
Labels
Comments
@AaronHForgeFlow Can you please take a look this issue? |
@AungKoKoLin1997 Too bad. I will check. It is not easy to solve, and it seems the core function it refers has been changed also. |
MiquelRForgeFlow
added a commit
to ForgeFlow/stock-logistics-workflow
that referenced
this issue
Nov 15, 2024
MiquelRForgeFlow
added a commit
to ForgeFlow/stock-logistics-workflow
that referenced
this issue
Nov 15, 2024
MiquelRForgeFlow
added a commit
to ForgeFlow/stock-logistics-workflow
that referenced
this issue
Nov 15, 2024
MiquelRForgeFlow
added a commit
to ForgeFlow/stock-logistics-workflow
that referenced
this issue
Nov 15, 2024
MiquelRForgeFlow
added a commit
to ForgeFlow/stock-logistics-workflow
that referenced
this issue
Nov 15, 2024
MiquelRForgeFlow
added a commit
to ForgeFlow/stock-logistics-workflow
that referenced
this issue
Nov 15, 2024
MiquelRForgeFlow
added a commit
to ForgeFlow/stock-logistics-workflow
that referenced
this issue
Nov 15, 2024
MiquelRForgeFlow
added a commit
to ForgeFlow/stock-logistics-workflow
that referenced
this issue
Nov 15, 2024
JasminSForgeFlow
pushed a commit
to ForgeFlow/stock-logistics-workflow
that referenced
this issue
Dec 17, 2024
JasminSForgeFlow
pushed a commit
to ForgeFlow/stock-logistics-workflow
that referenced
this issue
Dec 18, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I am creating a migration PR at #1676. The CI tests failed due to an issue with stock_account_product_run_fifo_hook, and I suspect this module may not be functioning correctly. I tried testing it in the Runboat environment on the 16.0 branch, and I encountered the issue.
Steps to reproduce:
After these steps, I encountered the issue shown in the attached image.
I believe the problem may be related to the following proposed commit: c913644
@qrtl
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: