Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][FIX] account_invoice_report_payment_info: compute should be multi #293

Conversation

yajo
Copy link
Member

@yajo yajo commented Oct 18, 2023

super() is multi-record, like all compute methods.

This one should be too. Otherwise, it fails to integrate with l10n_fr_account_vat_return with ValueError: Expected singleton: account.move(739, 737, 741, 735).

@moduon MT-1075

super() is multi-record, like all compute methods.

This one should be too. Otherwise, it fails to integrate with `l10n_fr_account_vat_return` with `ValueError: Expected singleton: account.move(739, 737, 741, 735)`.

@moduon MT-1075
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza changed the title [FIX] account_invoice_report_payment_info: compute should be multi [16.0][FIX] account_invoice_report_payment_info: compute should be multi Oct 18, 2023
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza added this to the 16.0 milestone Oct 18, 2023
Copy link
Member

@rafaelbn rafaelbn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ocabot merge patch

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

On my way to merge this fine PR!
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-293-by-rafaelbn-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 31ab3e2 into OCA:16.0 Oct 18, 2023
6 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at affab87. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@yajo yajo deleted the 16.0-account_invoice_report_payment_info-compute_multi branch October 19, 2023 10:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants