-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 699
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[RFC] Content of Migration Issues and use of ocabot migration command #3288
Comments
This is not really true. Such feature is not developed (although very interesting of course, not only here). OK for me to use the command. About the list, I populate it manually. It's very easy with a text editor to make some replace to get what's needed from the RST. |
Oh ! IYou're right. Opened an issue : OCA/oca-github-bot#189
And what about to NOT pre-populate it ?
|
OK for me. |
Mmm, maybe we can then reflect the list of open module migration PRs in modules140-150.rst as well! |
I'm not sure. Indeed, having all the information in the same page (and available on the documentation is great). In the other hand I think it will add extra work for commiters. I mean : for the time being, to propose a PR :
With your proposal :
What do you think ? Did I missed something ? |
Already done. |
hi all,
In each upgrade, openupgrade maintainers are creating an issue for the migration. like this one for the V14 #2190
Initialization of the migration Issue for 15
I just create an issue for migration 15 here : #3287
In my opinion, initializing the issue with the list of the all the odoo modules is redundant with the main file present here :
https://github.com/OCA/OpenUpgrade/blob/15.0/docsource/modules140-150.rst
So I'm in favour to have an empty issue and to a line per module with PR.
What do you think ?
use of ocabot command
Previously, maintainers has to update manually the issue to make reference to each PR. See :
I just made a test here and here and using the command
\ocabot migration module_name
works perfectly well.Advantage :
Do you agree that from now on we should use this command to update the main issue?
Thanks for your comment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: