Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable reflowing of packages that don't pass the valid version range rule #5524

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2018

Conversation

joelverhagen
Copy link
Member

Fix #5522

@joelverhagen
Copy link
Member Author

🔔

Copy link
Contributor

@shishirx34 shishirx34 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

/// <exception cref="PackagingException">
/// We default to use a strict version-check on dependency groups.
/// When an invalid dependency version range is detected, a <see cref="PackagingException"/> will be thrown.
/// </exception>
public static PackageMetadata FromNuspecReader(NuspecReader nuspecReader)
public static PackageMetadata FromNuspecReader(NuspecReader nuspecReader, bool strict)
Copy link
Contributor

@shishirx34 shishirx34 Feb 23, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: may be rename this parameter to dependencyVersionStrictCheck to better reflect the change?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was hoping to leave it as script so that future validations can be relaxed with this same parameter.

@joelverhagen joelverhagen merged commit 433de7c into dev Feb 24, 2018
@joelverhagen joelverhagen deleted the jver-relax-reflow branch February 24, 2018 01:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants