You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The identifier proposalId is not bound to anything, while it should be bound to a new definition, similar to parameter names.
Just skimming through the relevant links below, it seems like its scope is restricted to only the mapping(...), this it cannot be referenced anywhere else for now, but we should double check this:
Fixes#1213
I had to make the rule for `[MappingType]` fault-tolerant in order to
accommodate for older versions of Solidity, by splitting it in two.
Questions:
- Is it possible to avoid having to make a query for each key or value
parameter, and instead have `[Identifier]?` and query for its existence?
- The nodes for the parameters are "hanging in the air", as they don't
participate in anything useful. Should we attach them to the mapping
somehow?
For a mapping type like this:
The identifier
proposalId
is not bound to anything, while it should be bound to a new definition, similar to parameter names.Just skimming through the relevant links below, it seems like its scope is restricted to only the
mapping(...)
, this it cannot be referenced anywhere else for now, but we should double check this:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: