Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding a pricing page to our docs #502

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Oct 24, 2024
Merged

Adding a pricing page to our docs #502

merged 12 commits into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

tracykteal
Copy link
Contributor

@tracykteal tracykteal commented Oct 22, 2024

Adding in a Pricing page to our docs about the TimeGPT and TimeGEN subscriptions.

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Experiment Results

Experiment 1: air-passengers

Description:

variable experiment
h 12
season_length 12
freq MS
level None
n_windows 1

Results:

metric timegpt-1 timegpt-1-long-horizon SeasonalNaive Naive
mae 12.6793 11.0623 47.8333 76
mape 0.027 0.0232 0.0999 0.1425
mse 213.936 199.132 2571.33 10604.2
total_time 1.0014 1.2821 0.0057 0.0042

Plot:

Experiment 2: air-passengers

Description:

variable experiment
h 24
season_length 12
freq MS
level None
n_windows 1

Results:

metric timegpt-1 timegpt-1-long-horizon SeasonalNaive Naive
mae 58.1031 58.4587 71.25 115.25
mape 0.1257 0.1267 0.1552 0.2358
mse 4040.21 4110.79 5928.17 18859.2
total_time 0.6315 0.6338 0.0046 0.0041

Plot:

Experiment 3: electricity-multiple-series

Description:

variable experiment
h 24
season_length 24
freq H
level None
n_windows 1

Results:

metric timegpt-1 timegpt-1-long-horizon SeasonalNaive Naive
mae 178.293 268.129 269.23 1331.02
mape 0.0234 0.0311 0.0304 0.1692
mse 121586 219467 213677 4.68961e+06
total_time 0.6739 0.7165 0.0053 0.0049

Plot:

Experiment 4: electricity-multiple-series

Description:

variable experiment
h 168
season_length 24
freq H
level None
n_windows 1

Results:

metric timegpt-1 timegpt-1-long-horizon SeasonalNaive Naive
mae 465.496 346.976 398.956 1119.26
mape 0.062 0.0436 0.0512 0.1583
mse 835064 403762 656723 3.17316e+06
total_time 0.8383 0.7554 0.0056 0.005

Plot:

Experiment 5: electricity-multiple-series

Description:

variable experiment
h 336
season_length 24
freq H
level None
n_windows 1

Results:

metric timegpt-1 timegpt-1-long-horizon SeasonalNaive Naive
mae 558.684 459.764 602.926 1340.95
mape 0.0697 0.0565 0.0787 0.17
mse 1.2272e+06 739132 1.61572e+06 6.04619e+06
total_time 0.9849 0.7622 0.0057 0.0052

Plot:

Copy link

@carla-cr carla-cr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
{
Copy link
Contributor

@cchallu cchallu Oct 23, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should be careful on mixing TimeGPT and TimeGEN because it might not be clear the pricing and how to signup up is different for both. I suggest moving the title "TimeGPT Subscription Plans and Pricing" above these first paragraphs, and only mention TimeGPT here. We can add all the details of TimeGEN below.


Reply via ReviewNB

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good, I made that change in the updated PR.

@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
{
Copy link
Contributor

@cchallu cchallu Oct 23, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking great!

Some suggestions:

  • The title of this cell should be of the same size as "Free trial" above.
  • Adding the price per call is a good idea, but we are missing the actual fixed price. We can add a new row above called "Price per month (USD)" and add the cost ($0, $99, $399, customizable)
  • Add a Self-hosted row at the bottom and mark X on Enterprise.

Reply via ReviewNB

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, the pricing would be good. Added that and the self-hosted line.

@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
{
Copy link
Contributor

@cchallu cchallu Oct 23, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What do you think on adding after "Pricing on Azure is handled through Microsoft payment systems" that they don't need to signup to the dashboard for using Azure?

Missing link to spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uIkSEam4-K9S7JHzjgHG7vITTf-usnyo36aaUddsHPs/edit?usp=sharing


Reply via ReviewNB

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, added in the link to the spreadsheet, and updated the language in that section to talk about access through Azure too.

Copy link
Contributor

@cchallu cchallu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we also add the page in the mint.json file so that it appears in the nixtlaverse documentation? (like in #495)

@tracykteal
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comments are all resolved and went through live in our meeting. All set to merge.

@tracykteal tracykteal merged commit 928decd into main Oct 24, 2024
7 of 12 checks passed
@tracykteal tracykteal deleted the pricing branch October 24, 2024 20:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants