Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

mercurial: 6.9 -> 6.9.1 #377590

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: staging
Choose a base branch
from
Open

mercurial: 6.9 -> 6.9.1 #377590

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

techknowlogick
Copy link
Member

Changelog: https://wiki.mercurial-scm.org/Release6.9

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@nix-owners nix-owners bot requested review from pacien and lukegb January 28, 2025 16:50
@lukegb
Copy link
Contributor

lukegb commented Jan 28, 2025

This should probably target staging instead.

@techknowlogick
Copy link
Member Author

@lukegb, whoops. Branched off from setting place, let me rebase on staging. 1sec

@techknowlogick techknowlogick changed the base branch from master to staging January 29, 2025 01:15
@github-actions github-actions bot added 6.topic: python 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: documentation This PR adds or changes documentation 8.has: changelog 6.topic: emacs Text editor 6.topic: rust 6.topic: vim 6.topic: vscode 6.topic: continuous integration Affects continuous integration (CI) in Nixpkgs, including Ofborg and GitHub Actions and removed 6.topic: python 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: documentation This PR adds or changes documentation 8.has: changelog 6.topic: emacs Text editor 6.topic: rust 6.topic: vim 6.topic: vscode 6.topic: continuous integration Affects continuous integration (CI) in Nixpkgs, including Ofborg and GitHub Actions labels Jan 29, 2025
@ofborg ofborg bot added the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Jan 29, 2025
@techknowlogick
Copy link
Member Author

@lukegb I've just rebased on staging.

@ofborg ofborg bot removed the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Jan 29, 2025
lukegb
lukegb reviewed Jan 29, 2025
View reviewed changes
pkgs/applications/version-management/mercurial/default.nix
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ let
rustPlatform.fetchCargoVendor {
inherit src;
name = "mercurial-${version}";
hash = "sha256-k/K1BupCqnlB++2T7hJxu82yID0jG8HwLNmb2eyx29o=";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hrm, I'm getting sha256-k/K1BupCqnlB++2T7hJxu82yID0jG8HwLNmb2eyx29o= against staging on x86_64-linux and aarch64-linux.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@lukegb lukegb lukegb left review comments

@pacien pacien Awaiting requested review from pacien

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 501+ 10.rebuild-darwin: 2501-5000 10.rebuild-linux: 501+ 10.rebuild-linux: 5001+
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@techknowlogick @lukegb