-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
clash-rs: 0.7.0 -> 0.7.1 #354419
clash-rs: 0.7.0 -> 0.7.1 #354419
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM except:
Regarding the hash change for tuic-1.3.1
, see Watfaq/clash-rs#635 (review)
A changing source hash without version update seems suspicious and we should always check why that happens.
nixpkgs-review
result
Generated using nixpkgs-review
.
Command: nixpkgs-review pr 354419
x86_64-linux
✅ 1 package built:
- clash-rs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As tuic
simply didn't update the version in their Cargo.toml
: LGTM 👍
Unrelated:
Can't we use Cargo.lock
from upstream?
lockFile = "${src}/Cargo.lock";
Maybe I didn't spot it before but you committed as And a nitpick: please don't rebase onto a newer master unless necessary. Luckily your changes are small, because reviewing your force-push with all the other changes is kinda hard ;) |
Sorry, was just wondering (and not thinking). That's "import from derivation" which isn't allowed in nixpkgs but works locally 🤷♂️ |
|
Successfully created backport PR for |
Git push to origin failed for release-24.11 with exitcode 1 |
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.