conduwuit: init at 0.4.6

[niklaskorz]

Description of changes

I've been a happy conduwuit user for a while now. The most recent release brings along features like authenticated media and Element X (sliding sync) compatibility, which make it a well-suited alternative to conduit.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[niklaskorz]

Currently getting the following on aarch64-darwin if enableJemalloc is true (works fine without):

       > error: test failed, to rerun pass `-p conduit --bin conduit`
       >
       > Caused by:
       >   process didn't exit successfully: `/private/tmp/nix-build-conduwuit-0.4.6.drv-0/source/target/aarch64-apple-darwin/release/deps/conduit-c8303cb4f61487aa --test-threads=12` (signal: 11, SIGSEGV: invalid memory reference)

Edt: this is a known issue of unprefixed jemalloc on darwin, unfortunately rocksdb does not support prefixed jemalloc so just like upstream conduwuit I disabled jemalloc for rocksdb on darwin

[niklaskorz]

Tested on my own homeserver with an existing rocksdb, runs fine

[nyabinary]

Shouldn't a module be provided too with options? :P

[niklaskorz]

Shouldn't a module be provided too with options? :P

Right now conduwuit is compatible with the already existing conduit module. The conduwuit docs also currently recommend using the conduit module and just changing services.conduit.package to conduwuit.

[girlbossceo]

Personally I would love to see us having our own module so we can detach further from Conduit. I only mention using Conduit's module in the docs because no one's made our own dedicated module. I would be more than eager to remove usage of the Conduit module from the docs if we have our own module.

Hope that clarifies my stance on a conduwuit module.

[niklaskorz]

Personally I would love to see us having our own module so we can detach further from Conduit. I only mention using Conduit's module in the docs because no one's made our own dedicated module. I would be more than eager to remove usage of the Conduit module from the docs if we have our own module.

Hope that clarifies my stance on a conduwuit module.

I see, thanks for chiming in! I'll look into it when I return home again next week, if no one else did until then.

[nyabinary]

Personally I would love to see us having our own module so we can detach further from Conduit. I only mention using Conduit's module in the docs because no one's made our own dedicated module. I would be more than eager to remove usage of the Conduit module from the docs if we have our own module.
Hope that clarifies my stance on a conduwuit module.

I see, thanks for chiming in! I'll look into it when I return home again next week, if no one else did until then.

Any updates? :3

[niklaskorz]

Personally I would love to see us having our own module so we can detach further from Conduit. I only mention using Conduit's module in the docs because no one's made our own dedicated module. I would be more than eager to remove usage of the Conduit module from the docs if we have our own module.
Hope that clarifies my stance on a conduwuit module.

I see, thanks for chiming in! I'll look into it when I return home again next week, if no one else did until then.

Any updates? :3

Sorry, not yet! I was occupied fixing zed-editor on darwin but now have some room to look into a conduwuit module.