Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Backport release-23.05] python311Packages.gitpython: 3.1.31 -> 3.1.32 #256779

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[Backport release-23.05] python311Packages.gitpython: 3.1.31 -> 3.1.32 #256779

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Sep 22, 2023 •
edited by risicle
Loading

Bot-based backport to release-23.05, triggered by a label in #247172.

  • Before merging, ensure that this backport is acceptable for the release.
    • Even as a non-commiter, if you find that it is not acceptable, leave a comment.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the 1.severity: security Issues which raise a security issue, or PRs that fix one label Sep 22, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Sep 22, 2023
Merged
12 tasks
@risicle
Copy link
Contributor

risicle commented Sep 22, 2023

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-40267

@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from fabaff September 22, 2023 23:13
@risicle risicle mentioned this pull request Oct 16, 2023
Merged
12 tasks
@risicle risicle closed this Oct 16, 2023
@risicle risicle deleted the backport-247172-to-release-23.05 branch October 16, 2023 20:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@fabaff fabaff Awaiting requested review from fabaff

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
1.severity: security Issues which raise a security issue, or PRs that fix one 6.topic: python 10.rebuild-darwin: 101-500 10.rebuild-linux: 101-500
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@risicle @fabaff