Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

python3Packages.okta: 2.9.2 -> 2.9.3 #251803

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jbgosselin
Copy link
Contributor

@jbgosselin jbgosselin commented Aug 27, 2023

Description of changes

  • python3Packages.okta: 2.9.2 -> 2.9.3 (with fixed aenum dependency)

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 23.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@jbgosselin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fabaff This can be merged before #241853 So it doesn't break functionality.

@ofborg ofborg bot added 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 labels Aug 27, 2023
@@ -20,20 +20,30 @@
, yarl
}:

let
aenum_fixed = aenum.overridePythonAttrs (oldAttrs: rec {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overriding in python-modules should not be done. The proper fix would be to get support for aenum > 3.1.11 in okta.

okta/okta-sdk-python#368

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree that's a preferable outcome.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I took the initiative to make a PR that would fix their package okta/okta-sdk-python#370

@fabaff
Copy link
Member

fabaff commented Dec 21, 2023

Was updated in #251878

@fabaff fabaff closed this Dec 21, 2023
@jbgosselin jbgosselin deleted the python/okta/2.9.3 branch December 21, 2023 16:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants