Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mongosh: 1.5.0 -> 1.4.2 #181680

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2022
Merged

mongosh: 1.5.0 -> 1.4.2 #181680

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2022

Conversation

aaronjheng
Copy link
Contributor

@aaronjheng aaronjheng commented Jul 16, 2022

Description of changes

mongosh 1.5.0 requires nodejs 16. But there is a blocking issue #132456.
Also see: #161942 (comment).

Things done
  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 22.11 Release Notes (or backporting 22.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
    • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@aaronjheng aaronjheng marked this pull request as ready for review July 16, 2022 03:40
@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/1020

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

Please revert the update commit instead.

@aaronjheng
Copy link
Contributor Author

@SuperSandro2000 Like #187419 ?

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

No, I thought we had a bump commit but the init commit was at this version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants