Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tests extended #7

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Mar 18, 2024
Merged

Tests extended #7

merged 19 commits into from
Mar 18, 2024

Conversation

federicomarini
Copy link
Collaborator

Extending the suite of tests for the other functions, covering most use and edge cases.

We might need a couple of checks inside the function iSEEinit(), to verify that what the user wants is possible

Some examples:

  • the features are in (checking the rownames)
  • the relevant colData are really available (param vs the names)
  • the logical switches for the board and the dynamic marker table are indeed logicals.

This is minor but would reinforce the behavior even more.
Wanna give it a go @NajlaAbassi ? (and yes, "checking the GeneTonic repo" might be a fitting approach... 😉 )

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@federicomarini federicomarini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to go, just need the bump to 0.99.0

@federicomarini federicomarini merged commit 6fd5266 into main Mar 18, 2024
6 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant