Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[FEA] run integration tests against SPARK-3.0.1 #696

Closed
revans2 opened this issue Sep 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

[FEA] run integration tests against SPARK-3.0.1 #696

revans2 opened this issue Sep 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
build Related to CI / CD or cleanly building feature request New feature or request

Comments

@revans2
Copy link
Collaborator

revans2 commented Sep 9, 2020

Spark 3.0.1 is officially out. We should set up CI to at least run the integration tests against 3.0.1 nightly, but ideally we should do it as a part of the pre-merge build in parallel with the 3.0.0 build we do today.
@revans2 revans2 added feature request New feature or request ? - Needs Triage Need team to review and classify labels Sep 9, 2020
@tgravescs
Copy link
Collaborator

we have updated the versions and this should just work now but we need to test (or see what ci does tonight)

@tgravescs
Copy link
Collaborator

we needed to push the spark 3.0.1 to our urm repo but after that everything is working.

@sameerz sameerz added build Related to CI / CD or cleanly building and removed ? - Needs Triage Need team to review and classify labels Sep 18, 2020
tgravescs pushed a commit to tgravescs/spark-rapids that referenced this issue Nov 30, 2023
@nvauto
Update submodule cudf to eaa0706ef29c7b5dda588b84d1dee26abb4d8e3a (NV…
69e7374 
…IDIA#696)

Signed-off-by: spark-rapids automation <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: spark-rapids automation <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
build Related to CI / CD or cleanly building feature request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@revans2 @tgravescs @sameerz