Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Model EV Batteries #1533

Open
wants to merge 117 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Model EV Batteries #1533

wants to merge 117 commits into from

Conversation

aspeake
Copy link
Collaborator

@aspeake aspeake commented Oct 30, 2023

Pull Request Description

Allows detailed modeling of EVs using the EnergyPlus battery model, whereas previous EV charging was limited to a simple plug load. This PR adds arguments to define EV battery parameters, EV charger parameters, driving behavior such as miles traveled, and detailed charging and discharging schedules. The E+ battery model was used so that bidirectional charging can be supported in the future, but this capability is not included in this PR.

Key aspects of this PR include:

  • Leveraging the new Vehicles element in HPXML
  • A new vehicles.rb file to apply an EV as ElectricLoadCenter:Storage:LiIonNMCBattery object
  • Calls methods in battery.rb and uses some existing battery defaults
  • Default charging/discharging schedules based on stock data and potential for user-defined schedule files
  • EMS program in vehicles.rb to
    • Scale the effective discharge power based on ambient temperature
    • Track "unmet driving hours"
  • Outputs charging energy with the existing "End Use" type Electricity: Electric Vehicle Charging (MBtu) and writes a new "Unmet Hours" output type Driving (hr) (if specified)

Companion HPXML PR: hpxmlwg/hpxml#403
Schedule generation PR: #1757

Checklist

PR Author: Check these when they're done. Not all may apply. strikethrough and check any that do not apply.

PR Reviewer: Verify each has been completed.

  • Schematron validator (EPvalidator.xml) has been updated
  • Sample files have been added/updated (via tasks.rb)
  • Tests have been added/updated (e.g., HPXMLtoOpenStudio/tests and/or workflow/tests/hpxml_translator_test.rb)
  • Documentation has been updated
  • Changelog has been updated
  • openstudio tasks.rb update_measures has been run
  • No unexpected changes to simulation results of sample files

@shorowit shorowit added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 31, 2023
@shorowit
Copy link
Contributor

@aspeake I assume we will need to add error-checking for multiple batteries? I.e., you can't have two EV batteries, and you can't have one EV battery and one home battery. See here for context. Unless you are trying to address this limitation.

@aspeake
Copy link
Collaborator Author

aspeake commented Jan 23, 2024

@aspeake I assume we will need to add error-checking for multiple batteries? I.e., you can't have two EV batteries, and you can't have one EV battery and one home battery. See here for context. Unless you are trying to address this limitation.

Yes, for now we plan to limit to 1 EV/unit. However, the current implementation does allow for one home battery and one EV battery and expects separate schedules for each.

@shorowit
Copy link
Contributor

However, the current implementation does allow for one home battery and one EV battery and expects separate schedules for each.

I assume that probably won't work, for the same reason that modeling two home batteries wasn't previously supported. But we can worry about that later. More of a heads up for now.

Comment on lines +2703 to +2707
arg = OpenStudio::Measure::OSArgument::makeDoubleArgument('ev_miles_per_year', false)
arg.setDisplayName('Electric Vehicle: Miles Traveled')
arg.setDescription('The annual miles traveled by the EV.')
arg.setUnits('miles')
args << arg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@aspeake aspeake Jan 6, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Used to calculate the effective discharge power in vehicles.rb (power = kwh/mile * annl_miles / driving hours)

Comment on lines +2709 to +2713
arg = OpenStudio::Measure::OSArgument::makeDoubleArgument('ev_hours_per_week', false)
arg.setDisplayName('Electric Vehicle: Hours Driven per Week')
arg.setDescription('The weekly hours traveled by the EV.')
arg.setUnits('hours')
args << arg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not currently used, but will be needed in schedule generation PR

Comment on lines +2715 to +2718
arg = OpenStudio::Measure::OSArgument::makeDoubleArgument('ev_fraction_charged_home', false)
arg.setDisplayName('Electric Vehicle: Fraction Charged at Home')
arg.setDescription('The fraction charging energy provided by the at-home charger.')
args << arg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure if this argument belongs here. It will be used in ResStockArguments to scale the miles/year, which influences the schedule. I liked that it persists into the HPXML to give context to the miles/year, but the fraction is not used directly in OS-HPXML.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't follow. Why wouldn't OS-HPXML use this?This should affect how much charging is done at home, no?

charging_schedule = schedules_file.create_schedule_file(model, col_name: SchedulesFile::Columns[:BatteryCharging].name)
discharging_schedule = schedules_file.create_schedule_file(model, col_name: SchedulesFile::Columns[:BatteryDischarging].name)
elsif is_ev
charging_schedule, discharging_schedule = Vehicle.get_ev_charging_schedules(runner, model, battery, schedules_file)
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Get schedule file or schedule ruleset for EV

Comment on lines +126 to +130
# Calculate effective discharge power and rated power output
# Scale the effective discharge power by 2.25 to assign the rated discharge power. This value reflects the maximum power adjustment allowed in the EMS EV discharge program at -17.8 C.
ev_annl_energy = vehicle.energy_efficiency * vehicle.miles_per_year # kWh/year
eff_discharge_power = UnitConversions.convert(ev_annl_energy / annual_driving_hours, 'kw', 'w') # W
vehicle.rated_power_output = eff_discharge_power * 2.25
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The rated power output is set to avoid ever limiting the actual discharge power at a timestep. This means that some combinations of inputs could result in very high and unrealistic effective discharge powers (eg, high miles, low hours == high annual energy over a short amount of hours). Granted, this would only happen under unrealistic combinations of inputs.

@aspeake aspeake marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2025 00:27
@aspeake aspeake requested a review from shorowit January 7, 2025 00:28
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thoughts on including this file which shows the calculation of the default vehicle charging/discharging schedules?

GitHub Action and others added 2 commits January 7, 2025 17:35
…o ev_batteries

# Conflicts:
#	HPXMLtoOpenStudio/measure.xml
Copy link
Contributor

@shorowit shorowit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a lot of good stuff here. Here's my initial batch of comments, mostly focused on the BuildResHPXML measure, hpxml.rb class, schematron, and documentation. My main comments are:

  • Generalize the HPXML Vehicle implementation; we are only modeling EVs today, but everything should be generalized in case we include other vehicle types in the future.
  • Use better consistency between HPXML schema and arguments/properties/variables/descriptions.

Comment on lines +2679 to +2685
arg = OpenStudio::Measure::OSArgument::makeBoolArgument('ev_battery_present', false)
arg.setDisplayName('Electric Vehicle: Present')
arg.setDescription('Whether there is an electric vehicle battery present. If the `misc_plug_loads_vehicle_present` argument is true, this argument is superseded and vehicle charging will be modeled as a plug load only.')
arg.setDefaultValue(false)
args << arg

arg = OpenStudio::Measure::OSArgument::makeDoubleArgument('ev_battery_capacity', false)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you generalize this to better match the generic Vehicle element in HPXML? I.e.:

  • Replace "Electric Vehicle: Present" with "Vehicle: Type" where you can choose EV, ICE, etc., or "none". Default to "none".
  • Change all the display names from "Electric Vehicle: Foo" to be "Vehicle: Foo" and, for those arguments that only apply for certain vehicle types, say so in the description. (You'll find lots of examples of this in the code.) You may have to update the set_electric_vehicle() method a bit too use the vehicle type argument.
  • Change all descriptions to refer to "vehicle" instead of "EV".
  • Change all the arguments from ev_battery_foo to vehicle_foo.

This would allow someone to create an HPXML with other vehicle types too. Hopefully not too much work...


arg = OpenStudio::Measure::OSArgument::makeDoubleArgument('ev_battery_capacity', false)
arg.setDisplayName('Electric Vehicle: Nominal Battery Capacity')
arg.setDescription('The nominal capacity of the EV battery. If not provided, the OS-HPXML default is used.')
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Anytime you say "the OS-HPXML default is used", please include a link to the documentation. You'll find lots of examples where we do this.

Comment on lines 2741 to 2742
arg = OpenStudio::Measure::OSArgument::makeIntegerArgument('battery_num_bedrooms_served', false)
arg.setDisplayName('Battery: Number of Bedrooms Served')
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like this home battery argument got split from the rest. Please move it up.

Comment on lines +2697 to +2699
arg = OpenStudio::Measure::OSArgument::makeDoubleArgument('ev_energy_efficiency', false)
arg.setDisplayName('Electric Vehicle: Energy Efficiency')
arg.setDescription('The efficiency of the EV. If not provided, the OS-HPXML default is used.')
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is no "Energy Efficiency" element in the HPXML. Please use the same names that are used in the schema, otherwise it is confusing. Seems like it is "Combined Fuel Economy"?

Also, we should probably split this argument in two: the units (choice enumeration, it's fine if only "kWh/mile" is supported today) and the value. You can find examples of this in other arguments in the measure.

Comment on lines +2703 to +2704
arg = OpenStudio::Measure::OSArgument::makeDoubleArgument('ev_miles_per_year', false)
arg.setDisplayName('Electric Vehicle: Miles Traveled')
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Match HPXML schema... I assume "Miles Driven Per Year"?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we rename to vehicle-ev-foo.csv?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we rename to vehicle-ev.csv?

@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ Annual energy outputs are listed below.
==================================== ===========================
Type Notes
==================================== ===========================
Energy Use: Total (MBtu) Total energy consumption; includes any battery charging/discharging
Energy Use: Total (MBtu) Total energy consumption; includes any home battery charging/discharging, excludes electric vehicle discharging
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Kind of confused by this since it doesn't say anything about EV charging. Is this a simpler version of what you're trying to say?

Suggested change
Energy Use: Total (MBtu) Total energy consumption; includes any home battery charging/discharging, excludes electric vehicle discharging
Energy Use: Total (MBtu) Total energy consumption; includes any home battery charging/discharging and EV charging

Make similar edits below.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need to add Unmet Hours: Driving (hr) output and description.

def self.apply_electric_vehicle(runner, model, spaces, hpxml_bldg, vehicle, schedules_file)
model.getElectricEquipments.sort.each do |ee|
if ee.endUseSubcategory.start_with? Constants::ObjectTypeMiscElectricVehicleCharging
runner.registerWarning('Electric vehicle was specified as a plug load and as a battery, vehicle charging will be modeled as a plug load.')
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Glad to see you have a warning for this. 👍

Suggested change
runner.registerWarning('Electric vehicle was specified as a plug load and as a battery, vehicle charging will be modeled as a plug load.')
runner.registerWarning('Electric vehicle charging was specified as both a PlugLoad and a Vehicle, the latter will be ignored.')

(If you accept the suggestion, there are other files that need to be updated too.)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like you also changed the order of where the EV charging output occurs. That's probably fine, but please update the order in the documentation too.

# Assign charging and vehicle space
ev_charger = vehicle.ev_charger
if ev_charger.nil?
runner.registerWarning('Electric vehicle specified with no charger provided; battery will not be modeled.')
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
runner.registerWarning('Electric vehicle specified with no charger provided; battery will not be modeled.')
runner.registerWarning('Electric vehicle specified with no charger provided; EV charging will not be modeled.')

# Get schedules to calculate effective discharge power
charging_schedule, discharging_schedule = get_ev_charging_schedules(runner, model, vehicle, schedules_file)
if charging_schedule.nil? && discharging_schedule.nil?
runner.registerWarning('Electric vehicle battery specified with no charging/discharging schedule provided; battery will not be modeled.')
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm confused. Are schedules required? The schematron/docs say they are optional and that there are defaults.

Comment on lines +15 to +16
hpxml_bldg.vehicles.each do |vehicle|
next unless vehicle.vehicle_type == HPXML::VehicleTypeBEV
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should also add a warning for non-BEV vehicles to make it clear we are not modeling them. Something like this. And add a test in test_validation.rb.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority high
Projects
Status: In progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants