You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The total cloud fraction on isobaric levels are computed in UPP with cloud fraction on hybrid levels which are read from model outputs. @junwang-noaa reported GFS cloud fraction on isobaric levels have non-undefined values when cloud fraction on hybrid levels are not written out in mode outputs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@junwang-noaa and @HuiyaChuang-NOAA I think there is a bug in UPP code for rounding upper bound and lower bound of cloud fraction on isobaric levels at https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/UPP/blob/develop/sorc/ncep_post.fd/MDL2P.f#L1319
The points with undefined values should be restricted. I conducted a test with model history files from Jun's test and saw all cloud fraction on isobaric levels are in undefined values since no 3D cloud faction outputs in Jun's test.
The test without the fix is gfs.t00z.master.grb2f003 at /scratch2/NCEPDEV/ovp/Wen.Meng/ncep_post/develop/jun.
The test with fix is gfs.t00z.master.grb2f003 at /scratch1/NCEPDEV/stmp2/Wen.Meng/gfs.2013040100
The total cloud fraction on isobaric levels are computed in UPP with cloud fraction on hybrid levels which are read from model outputs. @junwang-noaa reported GFS cloud fraction on isobaric levels have non-undefined values when cloud fraction on hybrid levels are not written out in mode outputs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: