-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wrapper PR for: Thompson inner loop, Thompson subcycling bugfix, fix snet bug for Noah LSM #702
Wrapper PR for: Thompson inner loop, Thompson subcycling bugfix, fix snet bug for Noah LSM #702
Conversation
…ix_thompson_pass_correct_timestep
Merge "Bugfix in Thompson MP, pass correct timestep to core routine" into "Adding inner loop to Thompson microphysics"
…b.com/climbfuji/ccpp-physics into thompson_inner_loop_subcycling_bugfix_noah_bugfix
…into thompson_inner_loop_subcycling_bugfix_noah_bugfix
…ei-noaa/ccpp-physics into thompson_inner_loop_subcycling_bugfix_noah_bugfix
physics/gcycle.F90
Outdated
@@ -172,6 +172,13 @@ subroutine gcycle (me, nthrds, nx, ny, isc, jsc, nsst, tile_num, nlunit, | |||
min_ice(ix) = min_seaice | |||
endif | |||
|
|||
ZORFCS(ix) = zorll (ix) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@HelinWei-NOAA @SMoorthi-emc this came in via Helin's PR, is this still correct or does it need to be reverted?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done, please check again. Thanks!
Please use Moorthi's latest one.
…On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 6:02 PM Dom Heinzeller ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In physics/gcycle.F90
<#702 (comment)>:
> @@ -172,6 +172,13 @@ subroutine gcycle (me, nthrds, nx, ny, isc, jsc, nsst, tile_num, nlunit,
min_ice(ix) = min_seaice
endif
+ ZORFCS(ix) = zorll (ix)
@HelinWei-NOAA <https://github.com/HelinWei-NOAA> @SMoorthi-emc
<https://github.com/SMoorthi-emc> this came in via Helin's PR, is this
still correct or does it need to be reverted?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#702 (review)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALPHKYH4QMEVBAOYSGR4GJTTY47YXANCNFSM5AY2BLEA>
.
|
Thanks, I will revert those additional lines. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code look fine to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
approved
Description
This PR combines several changes:
Issue(s) addressed
Fixes #686
Fixes #669
Testing
See ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#702.
Dependencies
#702
NOAA-EMC/fv3atm#350
ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#702