-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
master update from dtc/develop 2019/12/17 #246
Merged
climbfuji
merged 14 commits into
NCAR:master
from
climbfuji:ncar_master_update_from_dtc_develop_20191217
Jan 6, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
483ea46
scripts/mkstatic.py: fix legacy Fortran code, add validation of suite…
climbfuji 5dd7cc9
scripts/mkstatic.py: report actual error from physics
climbfuji 7e569ae
Merge pull request #236 from climbfuji/travis_bugfix_2_20191101
climbfuji a1db0aa
Revert change to CODEOWNERS
climbfuji f3cad9e
Merge branch 'static_build_validate_suite_name' of https://github.com…
climbfuji c42a95d
Add logging message when performing unit conversions
climbfuji 60db806
src/CMakeLists.txt: bugfix for macOS when specifying libxml2 librarie…
climbfuji 5073d98
scripts/metadata2html.py: update for out-of-source build changes in u…
climbfuji 6da7808
Merge pull request #241 from climbfuji/bugfix_libxml2_info_message_un…
climbfuji b9ff247
scripts/metadata2html.py, scripts/ccpp_prebuild.py: change logic arou…
climbfuji f7ae56d
Merge pull request #242 from climbfuji/default_builddir_from_config
climbfuji 1d10272
src/CMakeLists.txt, src/ccpp.F90, src/ccpp_api.F90: compile only the …
climbfuji 4259622
Merge pull request #243 from climbfuji/minimal_compilation_static_mode
climbfuji d81bba7
Merge branch 'dtc/develop' of https://github.com/NCAR/ccpp-framework …
climbfuji File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do not understand the asterisk here. It appears to be something l like a 'general repeat count' but my reading of the standard says that repeat counts are always positive literal integers. On the other hand, Nag accepts this syntax, even for strict Fortran 2003 processing so I must be missing something. Do you have a format description of this syntax anywhere?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I don't. I have seen the same as you, it works with all compilers I have tested and with N=1...MANY string variables.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right. Nag is the gold standard when it comes to being really picky about Fortran standards so the fact that it accepts this syntax means I am missing something. I have to go find a Fortran uber-expert . . .