-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Improve Existing Best Practice Guide]: Validating software dependencies (CT starter kit) using dependabot #73
Comments
Hi @jpl-jengelke - this is pretty interesting - is using dependabot free? The GitHub security page seems to imply this is a paid service? If so - a stand-alone GitHub action workflow file to add it to a given repo would be super useful, along with integration of this into your |
The implementations I have used are all no cost. |
That's great to hear @jpl-jengelke |
Oh by the way, @jpl-jengelke can you please add labels to this ticket? Looking for the complexity level and the level of interest (requests) for this from the community. For the latter, we have one team interested in dependency management, and that's Unity. So at the least we can state "requested" until we check in with them for more. Also the category - which is likely "software lifecycle". |
…ware composition analysis section of the continuous testing starter kit. ...
…ich will not have some files until another PR is merged. ...
…uage update. ... Co-authored-by: Rishi Verma <[email protected]>
Issue #73: Release of CT Starter Kit Dependabot narrative. ...
@jpl-jengelke - is this ticket complete? Please close if so. |
Closing as this has been published. |
Checked for duplicates
Yes - I've already checked
Describe the needs
This is intended for the Continuous Testing Starter Kit.
It's desirable for OSS publishers to implement automatic security and bug scanning of software dependencies used within their repo. This SK will provide a guide on implementing basic dependabot checking for a software project with configurable options. It's GitHub Actions-based process that will be helped with a simple template.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: