Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RPC API Improvement] - Add object type to transaction effect [SUI-62] #6636

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

siomari
Copy link
Contributor

@siomari siomari commented Dec 7, 2022

Made some initial changes towards the addition of object type to transaction effect.
@patrickkuo Please review my progress til now and confirm that I am on the right path.
I know that those changes don't pass all the test yet.

Copy link
Contributor

@patrickkuo patrickkuo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good so far, you are on the right track.

@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ pub enum MoveFunctionArgType {
Object(ObjectValueKind),
}

#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, JsonSchema)]
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug)]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't remove JsonSchema

@@ -98,7 +99,7 @@ pub struct TemporaryStore<S> {
// into written directly.
written: BTreeMap<ObjectID, (SingleTxContext, Object, WriteKind)>, // Objects written
/// Objects actively deleted.
deleted: BTreeMap<ObjectID, (SingleTxContext, SequenceNumber, DeleteKind)>,
deleted: BTreeMap<ObjectID, (SingleTxContext, SequenceNumber, DeleteKind, Object)>,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we don't need to store the whole Object, which can be quite big, storing the type information should be enough

@@ -449,6 +449,15 @@ impl Object {
(self.id(), self.version(), self.digest())
}

pub fn compute_object_type(&self) -> ObjectType{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

compute imply getting the object type need computation and could be expansive (e.g. compute digest), we can simply call this get_object_type

@sangeetapagare
Copy link

we cannot doen all actions properly

@ghodkerupesh
Copy link

nice

@damirka
Copy link
Contributor

damirka commented Jun 28, 2024

Closing as stale! I believe, we have this change today.

@damirka damirka closed this Jun 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants