We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sind
cosd
sin
cos
It's more common to use degrees instead of radians in crystallography. Besides, sin and cos on floating point number is less accurate.
julia> sin(pi / 2) 1.0 julia> cos(pi / 2) 6.123233995736766e-17 julia> sind(90) 1.0 julia> cosd(90) 0.0 julia> tan(pi / 4) 0.9999999999999999 julia> tand(45) 1.0 julia> cot(pi / 4) 1.0000000000000002 julia> cotd(45) 1.0 julia> cos(pi) -1.0 julia> sin(pi) 1.2246467991473532e-16 julia> cosd(180) -1.0 julia> sind(180) 0.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Merge pull request #50 from MineralsCloud/compathelper/new_version/20…
ee5bb26
…22-06-25-00-10-56-976-00173023327 CompatHelper: bump compat for Functors to 0.3, (keep existing compat)
singularitti
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
It's more common to use degrees instead of radians in crystallography. Besides,
sin
andcos
on floating point number is less accurate.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: