Move bisect_ppx to instrumentation clause #6648
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A couple of recent PRs have added
--conditional
to the preprocessing clause of dune files. I had this branch waiting around, so maybe it's time to put the change in, to avoid the need for similar PRs in the future.In this PR:
bisect_ppx
updated to 2.5.0 inopam.export
preprocessing
clause toinstrumentation
dune-project
files require dune 2.7, which supports this new syntaxscripts/create_coverage_files.sh
passes a flag todune runtest
to create the coverage files when desired, otherwise the coverage files are not generatedscripts/require-ppxs.py
checks thatbisect_ppx
appears ininstrumentation
clausesWhile this is a big PR, most of the changes are boilerplate. There's also Emacs dune-mode re-indentation of the dune files, which was probably a mistake.