-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: increase test coverage #51
Conversation
…mically compute address from salt
Co-authored-by: Gustavo Antunes <[email protected]>
…contract keyring account
…feat/increase-test-coverage
…feat/increase-test-coverage
…feat/increase-test-coverage
…gic to use new utility functions
666d687
to
866b34c
Compare
New dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎
|
👍 Dependency issues cleared. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎ This PR previously contained dependency changes with security issues that have been resolved, removed, or ignored. Ignoring: Next stepsTake a deeper look at the dependencyTake a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev. Remove the packageIf you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency. Mark a package as acceptable riskTo ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with |
@SocketSecurity ignore npm/[email protected] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Thanks for all those changes 😄
Description
PR adds more unit tests for specific flows and error messages with the
keyring.ts
file. There is a minor refactor in the createAccount method to check for duplicate accounts.Pre-requisites
chainId
to Keyring API requests (transaction/typed message) eth-snap-keyring#231Test Coverage Report
Summary
The test coverage has been updated as part of the efforts to increase the code coverage for the
snap-account-abstraction-keyring
module. The tests were executed withyarn test:coverage --no-cache
, ensuring that cached results did not influence the outcomes. The coverage for thekeyring.ts
file is now above 95%.Coverage Overview