-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bug]: Transaction with invalid/unsupported type cannot be cleared from the wallet and remains as Unapproved
#23180
Comments
I agree |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity in the last 90 days. It will be closed in 45 days if there is no further activity. The MetaMask team intends on reviewing this issue before close, and removing the stale label if it is still a bug. We welcome new comments on this issue. We do not intend on closing issues if they report bugs that are still reproducible. Thank you for your contributions. |
Should I remove the stale label from this? @bschorchit |
…gging (#4596) ## Explanation This PR repairs some gaps in our validation of transaction parameters: * validate that if a transaction envelope type is specified that it is a valid type * validate transaction parameters before right before adding transaction to state * catch and log async errors Notes * The steps to reproduce in MetaMask/metamask-extension#23180 revealed an async error that was being swallowed. <!-- Thanks for your contribution! Take a moment to answer these questions so that reviewers have the information they need to properly understand your changes: * What is the current state of things and why does it need to change? * What is the solution your changes offer and how does it work? * Are there any changes whose purpose might not obvious to those unfamiliar with the domain? * If your primary goal was to update one package but you found you had to update another one along the way, why did you do so? * If you had to upgrade a dependency, why did you do so? --> ## References This PR will fix these bugs once clients are updated: * Related: MetaMask/MetaMask-planning#2341 * Related: MetaMask/metamask-extension#23180 ## Changelog <!-- If you're making any consumer-facing changes, list those changes here as if you were updating a changelog, using the template below as a guide. (CATEGORY is one of BREAKING, ADDED, CHANGED, DEPRECATED, REMOVED, or FIXED. For security-related issues, follow the Security Advisory process.) Please take care to name the exact pieces of the API you've added or changed (e.g. types, interfaces, functions, or methods). If there are any breaking changes, make sure to offer a solution for consumers to follow once they upgrade to the changes. Finally, if you're only making changes to development scripts or tests, you may replace the template below with "None". --> ### `@metamask/transaction-controller` - **FIXED**: Fixes gaps in transaction parameter validation and async error logging ## Checklist - [ ] I've updated the test suite for new or updated code as appropriate - [ ] I've updated documentation (JSDoc, Markdown, etc.) for new or updated code as appropriate - [ ] I've highlighted breaking changes using the "BREAKING" category above as appropriate
Closing as a fix has been merged: MetaMask/core#4596 |
Describe the bug
Problem: whenever I trigger a not-supported or invalid transaction type, with gasLimit and gasPrice params, if I accept the transaction MM stays loading, but the transaction stays in an
Unapproved
state. If I try to reject it, nothing happens and tx remainsUnapproved
and cannot clear it from the walletExpected behavior
I think that, if the tx type is invalid or not supported, we shouldn't allow to proceed with the MM popup?
cc @bschorchit @matthewwalsh0
Screenshots/Recordings
unapproved-tx-not-cleared.mp4
Steps to reproduce
type: '0x3'
Unapproved
Unapproved
Error messages or log output
No response
Version
11.10 but it's an pre-existing issue
Build type
None
Browser
Chrome
Operating system
Linux
Hardware wallet
No response
Additional context
No response
Severity
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: