Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update CamOps Personnel Market to Properly Not Generate Personnel on a roll of 7 #4677

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 21, 2024

Conversation

Algebro7
Copy link
Collaborator

A tester in Discord pointed out that the CamOps personnel market was occasionally generating personnel without a role. I observed that this was happening on rolls of 7, which CamOps page 203 says should be "no personnel available". Instead, the market was generating personnel without any roles which is kind of weird. Note this issue predates the renaming to CamOps--it existed in the StratOps personnel market as well.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 10.23%. Comparing base (7c8488d) to head (204adbb).
Report is 29 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #4677      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     10.79%   10.23%   -0.57%     
+ Complexity     5710     5708       -2     
============================================
  Files           950      950              
  Lines        131271   131277       +6     
  Branches      19135    19133       -2     
============================================
- Hits          14177    13442     -735     
- Misses       115875   116610     +735     
- Partials       1219     1225       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Sleet01 Sleet01 merged commit dbbf327 into MegaMek:master Aug 21, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants