Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Intro revision #798

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 25, 2023
Merged

Intro revision #798

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 25, 2023

Conversation

rocky
Copy link
Member

@rocky rocky commented Feb 24, 2023

I'd like to do a revision of the roadmap FUTURE.rst but that will be in a separate PR.

Some of this is not a neat as I would like, I think there is still a bit of duplication to remove. But I wanted definitely to remove the homegrown doctest stuff as a "feature" (in the positive sense).

@@ -36,30 +36,36 @@ Performance of \Mathics is not, right now, practical in large-scale projects and

<section title="What does \Mathics offer?">

Some of the features of \Mathics are:
Some of the features of \Mathics tries to be compatible with Wolfram Alpha within the confines of the Python ecosystem.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why Wolfram alpha? I guess that Wolfram Language or if you want, Wolfram kernel would be a more accurate description. wolfram alpha points more to a natural language web interface, I guess

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why Wolfram alpha?

Sorry, since I don't use this stuff, I often get this wrong.

Is "Wolfram-Language kernel" okay?

Copy link
Contributor

@mmatera mmatera left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apart from the comment, LGTM

Adjust description of what are trying to model.
@rocky rocky changed the title Intro revision FUTURE.rst revision Feb 25, 2023
@rocky rocky changed the title FUTURE.rst revision Intro revision Feb 25, 2023
@rocky rocky merged commit 5e3eecc into master Feb 25, 2023
@rocky rocky deleted the intro-revision branch February 25, 2023 01:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants