-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Place options 'All' and 'None' in correct section #770
Conversation
And go over docs and summary text for these. Add examples.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@mmatera I am not seeing some of the remaining functions |
nop, these symbols seem to be removed from WMA |
If we know when they were removed I will create a Pymathics module for compatibility with XXX, and move this out of core and into this.. |
I never have used that symbol. Legacy versions of the WMA documentation are online. For example, https://reference.wolfram.com/legacy/v4 has the documentation of version 4. However, I could not find a reference to these symbols. |
On the other hand, we use |
This is weird. Something similar happens for 'NotListQ' - it is used only in signature testing. And it is used a lot in SymJa rules in signatures as well which leads me to believe this is a part of Mathematica, just one not documented. We have the option of keeping this but removing it from user-printed documentation. Your thoughts? |
Or we could admit that it exists for use in function signature applicability and ask people not to use. I don't know. But personally, I don't like the idea of saying nothing and not informing what's up. |
I think we should keep it and document it, but maybe move the symbols to another section. |
A good place for these symbols would be |
And go over docs and summary text for these. Add examples.