-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Results not the same as in referenced paper #1
Comments
Never mind. I figured it out. If you set |
Good catch! I'm re-opening this as I wonder how best to call this out in the documentation (or whether there's a way to make that parameter readily modified by the user). |
MartyMacGyver
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 5, 2023
MartyMacGyver
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 5, 2023
MartyMacGyver
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 5, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi, just wondering if you noticed that the results are not the same as in the referenced paper Figure 5. From what I can tell all the model params and simulation are identical to Figure 5 A. The only thing I can think of is they used PSPICE perhaps and for some reason that causes a difference? Any ideas?
BTW, thanks for posting this. It helped me a lot!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: