Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation fix: Changed unused-keyword introduction version to 5.3.0 #1102

Conversation

Lakitna
Copy link
Contributor

@Lakitna Lakitna commented Jul 25, 2024

The community rule unused-keyword claims to be added in 5.1.0, but it was actually added in 5.3.0.

This is a docs-only change

@Lakitna Lakitna requested review from bhirsz and mnojek as code owners July 25, 2024 09:35
Copy link
Member

@bhirsz bhirsz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.00%. Comparing base (f62508c) to head (89ed040).
Report is 27 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1102      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.02%   97.00%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          37       39       +2     
  Lines        4670     4973     +303     
==========================================
+ Hits         4531     4824     +293     
- Misses        139      149      +10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bhirsz bhirsz merged commit 1b823a1 into MarketSquare:master Jul 25, 2024
13 checks passed
@Lakitna Lakitna deleted the fix/unused-keyword-version-in-documentation branch July 25, 2024 12:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants