Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hamlit upgraded to ~> 2.0.0 #5646

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2016
Merged

Conversation

skateman
Copy link
Member

A lot of speedup improvements: k0kubun/hamlit#43

@chessbyte
Copy link
Member

@dclarizio Please review

@jrafanie
Copy link
Member

jrafanie commented Dec 1, 2015

@skateman do you have any numbers as to how much faster/memory improvements? Is it possible to render some of our larger haml templates before/after?

Do we have adequate test coverage of our use of haml?
I'm concerned by the breaking changes listed above, how is our test coverage of these changes?

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Dec 16, 2015

<pr_mergeability_checker />This pull request is not mergeable. Please rebase and repush.

@chessbyte
Copy link
Member

@skateman Please rebase and push again

A lot of speedup improvements: k0kubun/hamlit#43
@chessbyte
Copy link
Member

@dclarizio please review

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Jan 7, 2016

Checked commit skateman@854a51d with ruby 2.2.3, rubocop 0.34.2, and haml-lint 0.13.0
1 file checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks good. 🍪

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Jan 7, 2016

<github_pr_commenter_batch />Some comments on commit skateman@854a51d

dclarizio pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2016
Hamlit upgraded to ~> 2.0.0
@dclarizio dclarizio merged commit b99a9ff into ManageIQ:master Jan 7, 2016
@dclarizio dclarizio added this to the Sprint 35 Ending Jan 25, 2016 milestone Jan 7, 2016
@skateman skateman deleted the hamlit-2.0 branch January 22, 2016 09:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants