Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HAMMER] Users without groups should use admin retirement #19319

Merged

Conversation

d-m-u
Copy link
Contributor

@d-m-u d-m-u commented Sep 20, 2019

Backport of #19309 which adds group check to system context for retirement

Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754043
@miq-bot assign @simaishi

@d-m-u
Copy link
Contributor Author

d-m-u commented Sep 20, 2019

@lfu please review

@miq-bot miq-bot changed the title Users without groups should use admin retirement [HAMMER] Users without groups should use admin retirement Sep 20, 2019
@d-m-u d-m-u force-pushed the fixing_user_with_no_group_retirement_check branch 3 times, most recently from 77e6479 to cf9ee20 Compare September 20, 2019 17:16
@simaishi simaishi requested a review from lfu September 20, 2019 18:00
@d-m-u d-m-u force-pushed the fixing_user_with_no_group_retirement_check branch 2 times, most recently from e6ecf26 to a392f02 Compare September 20, 2019 20:21
@simaishi
Copy link
Contributor

@lfu @tinaafitz is this good to go?

@d-m-u d-m-u force-pushed the fixing_user_with_no_group_retirement_check branch from a392f02 to 6dfff4d Compare September 23, 2019 14:49
@d-m-u
Copy link
Contributor Author

d-m-u commented Sep 23, 2019

@tinaafitz @lfu Satoe's waiting for this, please put it out of its misery

@d-m-u d-m-u force-pushed the fixing_user_with_no_group_retirement_check branch from 6dfff4d to e53ed26 Compare September 23, 2019 14:52
@d-m-u
Copy link
Contributor Author

d-m-u commented Sep 23, 2019

it's basically a logging change that now has sixteen comments.
we're just making it more difficult to get stuff backported to h at this point.
Satoe's still waiting for this.
@tinaafitz

@d-m-u d-m-u force-pushed the fixing_user_with_no_group_retirement_check branch from e53ed26 to 9a505fc Compare September 23, 2019 15:41
@d-m-u
Copy link
Contributor Author

d-m-u commented Sep 23, 2019

hey @lfu it's failing because you made me change it to responds to.
https://travis-ci.org/ManageIQ/manageiq/builds/588520854#L1045

@d-m-u
Copy link
Contributor Author

d-m-u commented Sep 23, 2019

can I please put it back to how it was?

@d-m-u d-m-u force-pushed the fixing_user_with_no_group_retirement_check branch from 9a505fc to df73dc8 Compare September 23, 2019 16:08
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Sep 23, 2019

Checked commit d-m-u@df73dc8 with ruby 2.4.6, rubocop 0.69.0, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0
2 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 🏆

@d-m-u
Copy link
Contributor Author

d-m-u commented Sep 23, 2019

hey @simaishi do you need a second approver on this?

@simaishi simaishi merged commit de5e4c8 into ManageIQ:hammer Sep 23, 2019
@simaishi simaishi added this to the Sprint 121 Ending Sep 30, 2019 milestone Sep 23, 2019
@d-m-u d-m-u deleted the fixing_user_with_no_group_retirement_check branch October 26, 2020 14:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants