Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a base Job#queue_signal method #19281

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2019

Conversation

agrare
Copy link
Member

@agrare agrare commented Sep 10, 2019

Add a queue_signal method to the base Job class

@agrare agrare added the wip label Sep 10, 2019
@djberg96
Copy link
Contributor

@agrare Nice! I, of course, will always advocate for comments on methods, even if it already feels self-explanatory.

Copy link
Member

@Fryguy Fryguy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we un-WIP?

Add a queue_signal method to the base Job class
@agrare agrare force-pushed the add_job_queue_signal branch from 2f454dc to d7a4804 Compare October 22, 2019 17:54
@agrare agrare changed the title [WIP] Add a base Job#queue_signal method Add a base Job#queue_signal method Oct 22, 2019
@agrare
Copy link
Member Author

agrare commented Oct 22, 2019

@Fryguy 👍 rebased and un-wip'd

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Oct 22, 2019

Checked commit agrare@d7a4804 with ruby 2.4.6, rubocop 0.69.0, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0
5 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 🍪

@chessbyte chessbyte assigned chessbyte and unassigned Fryguy Oct 22, 2019
@chessbyte chessbyte merged commit b5c6cd2 into ManageIQ:master Oct 22, 2019
@agrare agrare deleted the add_job_queue_signal branch October 22, 2019 20:29
@agrare agrare added this to the Sprint 123 Ending Oct 28, 2019 milestone Oct 22, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants