Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Always return 0 for missing num_cpu #17937

Merged

Conversation

Ladas
Copy link
Contributor

@Ladas Ladas commented Sep 3, 2018

Always return 0 for missing num_cpu

Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624535

@Ladas
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ladas commented Sep 3, 2018

@miq-bot assign @agrare
@miq-bot add_label bug

@Ladas Ladas force-pushed the always_return_zero_for_missing_num_cpu branch from 8bfe78c to 3f6620c Compare September 3, 2018 13:22
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Sep 3, 2018

Checked commit Ladas@3f6620c with ruby 2.3.3, rubocop 0.52.1, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0
1 file checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 🏆

@agrare agrare merged commit ce0dfa7 into ManageIQ:master Sep 4, 2018
@agrare agrare added this to the Sprint 94 Ending Sept 10, 2018 milestone Sep 4, 2018
@simaishi
Copy link
Contributor

simaishi commented Sep 4, 2018

@Ladas assume this is gaprindashvili/yes?

@Ladas
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ladas commented Sep 4, 2018

@simaishi yes, whatever is needed for the BZ

simaishi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2018
@simaishi
Copy link
Contributor

simaishi commented Sep 4, 2018

Gaprindashvili backport details:

$ git log -1
commit 7b7f243dcb124e5f5a80ff1d9ffaf0f42c4ece36
Author: Adam Grare <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue Sep 4 08:58:25 2018 -0400

    Merge pull request #17937 from Ladas/always_return_zero_for_missing_num_cpu
    
    Always return 0 for missing num_cpu
    (cherry picked from commit ce0dfa79281f2deffa58a70b93d2e139fa1ed256)
    
    Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625323

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants