Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adapt manageiq to new managers #15506

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2017
Merged

Conversation

moolitayer
Copy link

@moolitayer moolitayer commented Jul 4, 2017

Depends on: [merged] #15354

Adding two new providers to permissions file and ems_spec, should be merged after:

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Jul 5, 2017

This pull request is not mergeable. Please rebase and repush.

@moolitayer moolitayer changed the title New providers Adapt manageiq to new managers Jul 11, 2017
@@ -37,9 +37,11 @@
- ems-type:hawkular_datawarehouse
- ems-type:monitoring # removed in https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/15506
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this line also be removed, to fulfill the prophecy?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

10x, nice catch

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Jul 24, 2017

Checked commit moolitayer@ceb8905 with ruby 2.2.6, rubocop 0.47.1, and haml-lint 0.20.0
1 file checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 🍰

@agrare agrare closed this Jul 24, 2017
@agrare agrare reopened this Jul 24, 2017
@agrare
Copy link
Member

agrare commented Jul 24, 2017

Reopening to pick up changes from ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-openshift#21

@agrare agrare merged commit 31d3e41 into ManageIQ:master Jul 24, 2017
@agrare agrare added this to the Sprint 65 Ending Jul 24, 2017 milestone Jul 24, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants