Add ServiceTemplateContainerTemplate. #15356
Conversation
lfu
force-pushed
the
service_template_container_template
branch
from
1664b9b to
bfbfc77
Compare
lfu
force-pushed
the
service_template_container_template
branch
from
bfbfc77 to
3e454c4
Compare
|
cc @bzwei |
| # :config_info | ||
| # :provision | ||
| # :dialog_id (or) | ||
| # :new_dialog_name |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For this initial work we will not support new_dialog_name. User needs to prepare a dialog in advance.
|
|
||
| private | ||
|
|
||
| def create_dialogs(config_info) |
| end | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| def new_dialog_required?(info) |
| info && info.key?(:new_dialog_name) && !info.key?(:dialog_id) | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| def create_new_dialog(dialog_name, container_template_parameters) |
|
|
||
| transaction do | ||
| create_from_options(options).tap do |service_template| | ||
| dialog_ids = service_template.send(:create_dialogs, enhanced_config) |
| # :dialog_id (or) | ||
| # :new_dialog_name | ||
| # :container_project_id | ||
| # :new_project_name |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if you are going to support new_project_name, you need to have create_project logic in the code which I cannot find.
| # :new_dialog_name | ||
| # :container_project_id | ||
| # :new_project_name | ||
| # :container_template_id |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In your PR to provide available_container_projects I saw you can get ext_management_system from the template but I don't see you accept an ext_management_system (or better name container_manager) in the options. How do you set an ems in the catalog_item?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@bzwei ManageIQ::Automate::Container::Openshift::Operations::AvailableProjects got ext_management_system from container_template . It is not necessary to save it into the service template.
lfu
force-pushed
the
service_template_container_template
branch
3 times, most recently
from
ef86268 to
652a842
Compare
| class ServiceTemplateContainerTemplate < ServiceTemplateGeneric | ||
| def self.default_provisioning_entry_point(_service_type) | ||
| '/Service/Generic/StateMachines/GenericLifecycle/provision' | ||
| end |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@lfu You also need to override the default_retirement_entry_point so you do not pick up the setting from the base class. See app/models/service_template.rb#L302-L304. You want to return nil in this case.
| config_info = validate_config_info(options[:config_info]) | ||
| enhanced_config = config_info.deep_merge( | ||
| :provision => { | ||
| :configuration_template => ContainerTemplate.find(config_info.fetch_path(:provision, :container_template_id)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@lfu @bzwei I think we want to follow the pattern in ServiceTemplateOrchestration and use template_id here. https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/blob/master/app/models/service_template_orchestration.rb#L11
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@gmcculloug When we developed Orchestration service there is no configuration_template in resource_action table, so the orchestration_template is added as a resource of the service template.
I think we now can use configuration_template field to store the container template, like the way we store job template.
lfu
force-pushed
the
service_template_container_template
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b61f3c0 to
bf84e98
Compare
| end | ||
|
|
||
| def self.validate_config_info(info) | ||
| info[:provision][:fqname] ||= default_provisioning_entry_point('atomic') if info.key?(:provision) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For Ansible PlayBook services we are not exposing the provisioning entry point so this check would make sense there, but here the UI will allow for different automate entry points to be selected. cc @bzwei
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I misread this logic, the change is good as is. 👍
| self.class.send(:validate_config_info, opts) | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| # override |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this comment meaningful? Suggest dropping it.
| # do nothing since no service resources for this template | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| # override |
lfu
force-pushed
the
service_template_container_template
branch
2 times, most recently
from
3ab89b2 to
78f75d3
Compare
lfu
force-pushed
the
service_template_container_template
branch
from
78f75d3 to
6507cfd
Compare
|
Checked commit lfu@6507cfd with ruby 2.2.6, rubocop 0.47.1, and haml-lint 0.20.0 |
Add ServiceTemplateContainerTemplate for container template provisioning.
@miq-bot assign @gmcculloug
@miq-bot add_label enhancement, services, providers/containers