Add remote servers to rake evm:status_full #14107
Conversation
jrafanie
changed the title
Added server id to the workers status to line up workers more easily with the servers they're running on.
Naming is hard.
jrafanie
force-pushed
the
add_remote_servers_to_evm_status
branch
from
a60e743 to
f9fe840
Compare
jrafanie
changed the title
|
@carbonin @gtanzillo @Fryguy Please review |
|
Checked commits jrafanie/manageiq@3a04d34~...f9fe840 with ruby 2.2.6, rubocop 0.47.1, and haml-lint 0.20.0 |
jrafanie
changed the title
jrafanie
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good!
I would look into the possible effects of changing the output of the evm:status command though. I remember seeing someone somewhere parsing the output of this.
Also, with this type of diagnosis in mind, do we want to replicate assigned_server_roles? Does anyone remember the reason for excluding that table?
|
Gah sorry @carbonin . My page was stale and I didn't see your comment until after I merged 😕 |
Good point @carbonin, I'll ping Brad to make sure the field knows about this PR and perhaps they can offer suggestions to keep the output easy for them to parse.
EDIT: Same for miq_workers... it looks like those are NOT replicated... I don't know that we need them centrally but perhaps it would be nice run this script centrally to get a good high level overview of the application, regions, zones, servers, workers, roles, etc. |
This PR adds a new rake task,
evm:status_full, that prints the local server and remote servers and their workers ordered by server and zone.I also added:
is_mastercolumn to the server outputmiq_server_idcolumn to the worker outputI'm not in love with the rake task name or if this should replace
evm:statusor be a new rake task.Here is what it look like using a sanitized central database (with multiple regions):