-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
Add/un-hide throttling setting for network limits #940
Comments
@fdupont-redhat, do you know the status of the backend for this network throttling setting? Do we have a 5.10.5 BZ for that? |
It's going to be a 5.11 / Ivanchuk feature because we need some changes in virt-v2v and virt-v2v-wrapper and that won't happen in the 5.10.5 timeframe. |
Ok, got it. Thanks for the info. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 6 months. If you can still reproduce this issue on the current release or on Thank you for all your contributions! |
@fdupont-redhat is network throttling still on the list for ivanchuk? |
@mturley no, it's not. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months. If you can still reproduce this issue on the current release or on Thank you for all your contributions! More information about the ManageIQ triage process can be found in the traige process documentation. |
Originally part of issue #867, and implemented but hidden / commented-out in PR #897, we need to uncomment and merge this network throttling field when the back end support is ready.
This was split out from #911 because the CPU and network fields need to be merged separately. We can do this by reverting the last commit 929d236 from #915.
These two throttling fields were originally associated with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690851,
but we probably need a new BZ targeted for 5.10.5.This will be targeted for CFME 5.11.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: