Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Displays a more informative message on single datasource deletion. #353

Merged

Conversation

josejulio
Copy link
Member

@josejulio
Copy link
Member Author

@Jiri-Kremser could you please review?

@josejulio josejulio force-pushed the datasource_more_informative_message branch from 6e9afb9 to e24372a Compare February 10, 2017 18:42
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Feb 10, 2017

Checked commit josejulio@e24372a with ruby 2.2.6, rubocop 0.47.1, and haml-lint 0.20.0
1 file checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks good. 🍰

@jkremser
Copy link
Member

lgtm

@martinpovolny martinpovolny merged commit 6b61906 into ManageIQ:master Feb 11, 2017
@martinpovolny martinpovolny self-assigned this Feb 11, 2017
@martinpovolny martinpovolny added this to the Sprint 54 Ending Feb 13, 2017 milestone Feb 11, 2017
@josejulio
Copy link
Member Author

@martinpovolny Should this be euwe/yes as the other PR? They are for the same BZ.

@martinpovolny
Copy link
Member

yes, because of: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396237

Would be nice if the authors could indicate that.

@simaishi
Copy link
Contributor

simaishi commented Mar 7, 2017

Euwe backport (to manageiq repo) details:

$ git log -1
commit 5e0040e5964a940aa6000ea6d35bd4275be7f4c8
Author: Martin Povolny <[email protected]>
Date:   Sat Feb 11 10:43:39 2017 +0100

    Merge pull request #353 from josejulio/datasource_more_informative_message
    
    Displays a more informative message on single datasource deletion.
    (cherry picked from commit 6b61906c1a0fbafe3b2d85d630f89f365ecf2e1a)
    
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396237

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants